Appeal 2007-0707
Application 10/799,468
As a final point, we note that Appellant bases no argument upon
objective evidence of nonobviousness, such as unexpected results, to rebut
the prima facie case of obviousness established by the Examiner.
In conclusion, based on the foregoing and the reasons well stated by
the Examiner, the Examiner’s decision rejecting the appealed claims is
affirmed.
No time period for taking any subsequent action in connection with
this appeal may be extended under 37 C.F.R. § 1.136(a)(1)(iv) (2007).
AFFIRMED
hh
WILLIAMS, MORGAN & AMERSON
10333 RICHMOND, SUITE 1100
HOUSTON, TX 77042
6
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6
Last modified: September 9, 2013