The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte MICHAEL WAYNE BROWN, MARK JOSPEH HAMZY, and
SCOTT THOMAS JONES
______________
Appeal 2007-0716
Application 09/946,201
Technology Center 2100
____________
Decided: June 11, 2007
____________
Before JAMES D. THOMAS, JOHN C. MARTIN, and JEAN R. HOMERE,
Administrative Patent Judges.
HOMERE, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
Appellants appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the Examiner’s Final
Rejection of claims 1 through 4, 6, 8 through 18, 20, and 22 through 55.
Claims 5, 7, 19 and 21 have been canceled. We have jurisdiction under
35 U.S.C. § 6(b) to decide this appeal.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013