Appeal 2007-0716 Application 09/946,201 CONCLUSION OF LAW On the record before us, Appellants have not shown that the Examiner failed to establish that Schreiber anticipates the claimed invention under 35 U.S.C. § 102 (e). DECISION We affirm the Examiner’s decision to reject claims 1 through 4, 6, 8 through 18, 20, and 22 through 55 under 35 U.S.C. § 102(e) as being anticipated by Schreiber. No time period for taking any subsequent action in connection with this appeal may be extended under 37 C.F.R. § 1.136(a)(1)(iv). AFFIRMED rwk IBM CORP (YA) C/O YEE & ASSOCIATES PC P.O. BOX 802333 DALLAS TX 75380 9Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Last modified: September 9, 2013