The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte TIMOTHY RAYMOND HEINDEL, TIM JOSEPH JANSSEN, SCOTT LEE PENNINGS, GARY MACK REYNOLDS, PAUL JOHN SERBIAK, BRUCE MICHAEL SIEBERS, ROBERT EUGENE VOGT, and GEORGIA LYNN ZEHNER ____________ Appeal 2007-0724 Reexamination Control 90/006,775 Patent 6,428,5261 Technology Center 3700 ____________ Decided: June 20, 2007 ____________ Before RICHARD E. SCHAFER, ADRIENE LEPIANE HANLON, and SALLY G. LANE, Administrative Patent Judges. HANLON, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL 1 Patent 6,428,526 was granted August 6, 2002, and is based on Application 08/834,777 filed April 3, 1997. The real party in interest is Kimberly-Clark Worldwide, Inc.Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013