The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ___________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ___________ Ex parte TINKU ACHARYA, BHARGAB B. BHATTACHARYA, PARTHA BHOWMICK, ARIJIT BISHNU, JAYANTA K. DEY, MALAY K. KUNDU, and CHIVUKULA ANJANEYA MURTHY ___________ Appeal 2007-0757 Application 09/952,249 Technology Center 2600 ___________ Decided: May 24, 2007 ___________ Before KENNETH W. HAIRSTON, JOSEPH F. RUGGIERO, and JOSEPH L. DIXON, Administrative Patent Judges. DIXON, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. §§ 6(b) and 134 from the Examiner's Final Rejection of claims 1-20. We AFFIRM.Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013