The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
is not binding precedent of the Board
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________________
Ex parte ANTONIO J. COLMENAREZ,
HUGO J. STRUBBE, and SRINIVAS GUTTA
____________________
Appeal 2006-0762
Application 09/822,1211
Technology Center 2600
____________________
Decided: July 23, 2007
____________________
Before: JOSEPH L. DIXON, JEAN R. HOMERE and JAY P. LUCAS,
Administrative Patent Judges.
LUCAS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
STATEMENT OF CASE
Appellants appeal from a final rejection of claims 1 to 25 under
authority of 35 U.S.C. § 134. The Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences
(BPAI) has jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. § 6(b).
1 Application filed March 30, 2001. The real party in interest is Koninblijke
Philips Electronic, NV, a corporation of the Netherlands.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013