The opinion in support of the decision being entered today is not binding
precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte DAVID A. EBERT
____________
Appeal 2007-0787
Application 10/689,230
Technology Center 3600
____________
Decided: June 6, 2007
____________
Before RICHARD E. SCHAFER, RICHARD TORCZON, and
ROMULO H. DELMENDO, Administrative Patent Judges.
SCHAFER, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
1 Applicant appeals the Final Rejection of claims 1 to 11 under
2 35 U.S.C. § 134 (2002). We have jurisdiction. 35 U.S.C. § 6(b) (2002).
3 An examiner rejected Claims 1 and 5 under 35 U.S.C § 102(b) and
4 Claims 2-4 and 6-11 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a). We reverse these rejections
5 and enter a new ground of rejection of Claim 1 under § 103(a).
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013