Ex Parte Ebert - Page 4

                Appeal 2007-0787                                                                              
                Application 10/689,230                                                                        










           1    F. 14. The lever assembly includes a shank or base 20 and a lever or handle                   
           2    body 22.11                                                                                    
           3    F. 15. The handle 22 may be made of materials including “metal such as                        
           4    chrome or brass, wood, porcelain or plastic.12”                                               
           5    F. 16. Tokarz does not describe the material of the shank portion 20.                         
           6    F. 17. Tokarz does not anticipate the subject matter of Claim 1.                              
           7                                      ISSUES                                                      
           8          The Examiner contends that the subject matter of Claim 1 is                             
           9    anticipated by the lever assembly described and shown by Tokarz.                              
          10          Applicant contends that Tokarz does not describe all the limitations of                 
          11    Claim 1 and is not anticipated.                                                               
          12          The issue before us is whether Tokarz describes a lever assembly                        
          13    encompassed by the subject matter of Applicant’s Claim 1.                                     
          14                              PRINCIPLES OF LAW                                                   
          15          Anticipation requires that that every limitation of the claim be found,                 
          16    either expressly or under principles of inherency, in a single prior art                      
          17    reference.  Minnesota Mining and Mfg. Co. v. Johnson & Johnson                                
                                                                                                             
                11 Tokarz 2:45-47.                                                                            
                12 Tokarz 1:56-59.                                                                            

                                                     - 4 -                                                    

Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013