UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte DEAN L. RHOADES ____________ Appeal 2007-0796 Application 10/236,088 Technology Center 3700 ____________ Decided: October 17, 2007 ____________ Before TERRY J. OWENS, MURRIEL E. CRAWFORD, and JENNIFER D. BAHR, Administrative Patent Judges. BAHR, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL STATEMENT OF THE CASE Dean L. Rhoades (Appellant) originally appealed under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the Examiner’s decision rejecting claims 1-9, 11-22, 25-31, 33- 37 and 39. The Examiner has withdrawn the rejections of claim 13, so only claims 1-9, 11, 12, 14-22, 25-31, 33-37 and 39 are involved in this appeal. The Examiner has additionally withdrawn the rejections of claims 11-22 and 24 under 35 U.S.C. § 112, second paragraph. Claim 13 stands objected to asPage: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013