Appeal 2007-0796
Application 10/236,088
THE REJECTIONS
The Examiner relies upon the following as evidence of
unpatentability:
Klophaus US 2,029,236 Jan. 28, 1936
Fisher US 2,111,362 Mar. 15, 1938
Joseph US 2,549,098 Apr. 17, 1951
Grosskopf US 5,727,819 Mar. 17, 1998
Mengel US 6,360,462 B1 Mar. 26, 2002
Genuise US 6,641,390 B2 Nov. 04, 2003
Jeter US 6,793,075 B1 Sep. 21, 2004
The following rejections are before us for review.
(1) Claims 1-7 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as anticipated by
Klophaus.
(2) Claims 11, 12, 14-16, 19-22, 25, 27, 28 and 33 stand rejected under 35
U.S.C. § 102(b) as anticipated by Genuise.
(3) Claims 11, 12, 14-17, 19, 21, 22, 25-28 and 33 stand rejected under 35
U.S.C. § 102(b) as anticipated by Fisher.
(4) Claims 11, 12, 14-17, 19-22, 25-28 and 33 stand rejected under 35
U.S.C. § 102(b) as anticipated by Joseph.
(5) Claims 1-7 and 9 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as
unpatentable over Mengel in view of Klophaus and Fisher.
(6) Claim 8 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as unpatentable over
Mengel in view of Klophaus, Fisher and Jeter.
(7) Claims 18, 29-31, 34, 36, 37 and 39 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C.
§ 103(a) as unpatentable over Fisher in view of Jeter and Mengel.
(8) Claim 35 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as unpatentable
over Fisher in view of Grosskopf.
4
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013