Ex Parte Ueta et al - Page 1



                   The opinion in support of the decision being entered today is not binding                           
                                              precedent of the Board.                                                  

                          UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                    
                                                   ____________                                                        
                                BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                     
                                             AND INTERFERENCES                                                         
                                                   ____________                                                        
                                 Ex parte SHIGEKI UETA, SHUJI HAMANO,                                                  
                                             and TOSHIHARU NODA                                                        
                                                   ____________                                                        
                                                 Appeal 2007-0873                                                      
                                              Application 10/395,236                                                   
                                             Technology Center 1700                                                    
                                                   ____________                                                        
                                              Decided:  July 13, 2007                                                  
                                                   ____________                                                        
                 Before BRADLEY R. GARRIS, THOMAS A. WALTZ, and                                                        
                 CATHERINE Q. TIMM, Administrative Patent Judges.                                                      
                 TIMM, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                    


                                             DECISION ON APPEAL                                                        
                        Appellants appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134(a) from the Examiner’s                                 
                 decision rejecting claims 7-11.  We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. § 6(b).                         
                        We REVERSE.                                                                                    








Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013