The opinion in support of the decision being entered today is not binding
precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________________
Ex parte NEVENKA DIMITROVA and ANGEL JANEVSKI
____________________
Appeal 2007-0926
Application 09/818,3031
Technology Center 2600
____________________
Decided: August 14, 2007
____________________
Before LANCE LEONARD BARRY, ALLEN R. MACDONALD, and JAY
P. LUCAS, Administrative Patent Judges.
LUCAS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
STATEMENT OF CASE
Appellants appeal from a Final Rejection of claims 1 to 59 under
authority of 35 U.S.C. § 134. The Board of Patent Appeals and
Interferences has jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. § 6(b).
1 Application filed March 27, 2001. The real party in interest is U. S. Philips
Corp.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013