Appeal 2007-0926
Application 09/818,303
CONCLUSION OF LAW
Based on the findings of facts and analysis above, we conclude that
Appellants have shown the Examiner erred in rejecting claims 1-2, 4-11,
13-25, 27-29, 31-38, 40-52, and 54-59 under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b).
We conclude that Appellants have not shown the Examiner erred in
rejecting claims 3, 12, 26, 30, 39, and 53 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a).
DECISION
The rejection of claims 1-2, 4-11, 13-25, 27-29, 31-38, 40-52, and
54-59 under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) for being anticipated by Reimer is reversed.
The rejection of claims 3, 12, 30, and 39 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) for
being obvious over Reimer in view of Wang is affirmed.
The rejection of claims 26 and 53 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) for being
obvious over Reimer in view of Menard is affirmed.
No time period for taking any subsequent action in connection with
this appeal may be extended under 37 C.F.R. § 1.136(a).
AFFIRMED-IN-PART
rwk
PHILIPS INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY & STANDARDS
P.O. BOX 3001
BRIARCLIFF MANOR NY 10510
11
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
Last modified: September 9, 2013