The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte WILLIAM PHILIP SHAOUY and
MATTHEW BUNKLEY TREVATHAN
____________
Appeal 2007-0987
Application 09/810,992
Technology Center 2100
____________
Decided: May 24, 2007
____________
Before LEE E. BARRETT, JOSEPH F. RUGGIERO, and
JEAN R. HOMERE, Administrative Patent Judges.
RUGGIERO, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
Appellants appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the Final Rejection of
claims 1-20. We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. § 6(b).
Appellants’ disclosed invention relates to a method and apparatus for
tailoring information to the characteristics of a user of an application
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013