Ex Parte Shaouy et al - Page 2

              Appeal 2007-0987                                                                        
              Application 09/810,992                                                                  
              program such as a web browser.  A request object, which contains profile                
              elements that convey characteristics of the user, is transmitted from the               
              application program to an arbiter.  The arbiter performs an analysis of the             
              request object and selects a personalization engine based on the outcome of             
              the analysis.  The request object is presented to the selected personalization          
              engine which accesses a content database to retrieve a personalized content             
              object which includes tailored information for the user.  (Specification 2-3.)          
                     We affirm.                                                                       
                     Claim 1 is illustrative of the invention and it reads as follows:                
                 1. A method for tailoring information to characteristics of an information           
                     user, comprising:                                                                
                 a) passing a request object containing at least one profile element to an            
                     arbiter;                                                                         
                 b) actively selecting, by analysis of the at least one profile element, a            
                     personalization engine from a plurality of personalization engines by            
                     the arbiter, the arbiter refining and altering a selection based on a            
                     number and type of the profile element;                                          
                 c) accessing a content database to retrieve a personalized content object            
                     identified by the personalization engine selected by the arbiter.                
                     The Examiner relies on the following prior art references to show                
              unpatentability:                                                                        
              Kurtzman, II  US 6,044,376  Mar. 28, 2000                                               
              Jacobi    US 6,064,980  May 16, 2000                                                    
              Kadowaki   US 6,313,921 B1  Nov.  6, 2001                                               
                                                        (filed Sep. 18, 1998)                         
              Tetzlaff   US 6,556,963 B1  Apr. 29, 2003                                               
                                                        (filed Sep. 24, 1997)                         



                                                  2                                                   

Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013