Ex Parte Remboski et al - Page 2


                Appeal 2007-1047                                                                               
                Application 09/944,892                                                                         
                                             THE INVENTION                                                     
                      The disclosed invention relates generally to the field of                                
                communication systems for vehicles such as automobiles and trucks, and                         
                more particularly, to communicatively coupling devices within the vehicle                      
                (Specification 1).                                                                             
                      Representative claim 1 is illustrative:                                                  
                             1.  A vehicle comprising:                                                         
                             a first device;                                                                   
                             a second device;                                                                  
                             an active network, wherein the active network communicatively                     
                      couples the first and second devices, the active network having an                       
                      overall communication capability and a portion of the overall                            
                      communication begin [sic] reserved for communication usage by the                        
                      first device.                                                                            

                                            THE REFERENCES                                                     
                      The Examiner relies upon the following references as evidence of                         
                unpatentability:                                                                               
                Matsuda   US 5,499,247   Mar. 12, 1996                                                         
                Bertin    US 5,940,372   Aug. 17, 1999                                                         

                                             THE REJECTION                                                     
                      Appellants seek our review of the following rejection:                                   
                      1. Claims 1-9 and 11-21 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as                       
                          being unpatentable over the teachings of Matsuda in view of                          
                          Bertin.                                                                              


                                                      2                                                        

Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013