The opinion in support of the decision being entered today is not binding
precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte KAREN T. SIGNORINI
__________
Appeal 2007-1097
Application 10/230,593
Technology 2800
___________
Decided: September 21, 2007
___________
Before ADRIENE LEPIANE HANLON, RICHARD TORCZON, and
MICHAEL P. TIERNEY, Administrative Patent Judges.
HANLON, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
1 A. STATEMENT OF CASE
2 The Appellant seeks review under 35 U.S.C. § 134 of a final rejection
3 of claims 1, 8-11, and 18-28, all of the claims pending in the application.
4 We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. § 6(b).
5 The application on appeal was filed on August 29, 2002.
6 The real party in interest is Micron Technology, Inc.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013