The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte TIMOTHY J. COONEY,
RAYMOND GOSS, WILLIAM WARREN,
THOMAS AKERS, and JASON HOLLAR
__________
Appeal No. 2007-1110
Application No. 09/832,603
Technology Center 3600
__________
Decided: September 24, 2007
__________
Before TERRY J. OWENS, MURRIEL E. CRAWFORD and
HUBERT C. LORIN, Administrative Patent Judges.
LORIN, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
This is an appeal from a decision of the Examiner rejecting claims 1-20.
35 U.S.C. § 134 (2002). We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. § 6 (b) (2002).
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013