Ex Parte Levi et al - Page 1



                 The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written                 
                         for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                         

                       UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                            
                                              ____________                                                  
                             BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                             
                                         AND INTERFERENCES                                                  
                                              ____________                                                  
                                         Ex parte GUY LEVI and                                              
                                    MARTINA ADRIANA MOSTERT                                                 
                                              ____________                                                  
                                            Appeal 2007-1183                                                
                                          Application 10/281,706                                            
                                         Technology Center 1700                                             
                                              ____________                                                  
                                         Decided:  March 20, 2007                                           
                                              ____________                                                  
               Before EDWARD C. KIMLIN, THOMAS A. WALTZ, and LINDA M.                                       
               GAUDETTE, Administrative Patent Judges.                                                      
               KIMLIN, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                         

                                         DECISION ON APPEAL                                                 
                      This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 8-14 and 16-23.                  
               We have jurisdiction pursuant to 35 U.S.C. §§ 6 and 134.  Claims 8 and 17                    
               are illustrative:                                                                            
                      8.  A stable puree composition comprising:                                            
                            a. from about 20.0% to about 97.5% by weight water;                             




Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013