Appeal 2007-1183 Application 10/281,706 specifically discloses heating fresh fruit at mild temperatures for around three minutes in order to inactivate enzymes in the surface layers of the fruit and, thereby, prevent the undesirable loss of natural color via browning (see para. bridging cols. 1 and 2). As noted by the Examiner, Gaudagni exemplifies heating fresh peaches in an aqueous solution of 0.1% ascorbic acid. Consequently, we find that one of ordinary skill in the art would have found it obvious, based on the collective teachings of Guadagni and Gordon, to store unripened fruits and vegetables, such as avocados, in darkness at cool temperatures and then treat the fruits and vegetables with an acidic solution at mild temperatures for about three minutes to inactivate the enzymes in the surface layers. Hence, we agree with the Examiner that methods within the scope of claims 17-19 on appeal would have been prima facie obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art. Concerning the puree composition of claim 8 which comprises the fruit pulp composition of the claimed method, we agree with the Examiner that Huchette evidences the obviousness of making puree compositions comprising fruit pulp. Huchette discloses compositions comprising potato pulp as a thickening base and various fruits, such as apples and apricots. While Appellants contend that the combination of references “does not, even in the slightest way, disclose the specific stable puree composition claimed in this invention” (page 13 of Br., second paragraph), we think that Appellants used the term “specific” rather loosely. The breadth of claim 8 is quite extensive with respect to the specific fruit, the amount of water (about 20.0% to about 97.5%) the amount of thickening base (0.01 to about 10.0%) and the amount of fruit pulp composition (about 1.0 to about 75.0%). Since 5Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013