The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte MARC GIANOTTI
__________
Appeal 2007-1197
Application 10/674,729
Technology Center 3700
__________
Decided: May 23, 2007
__________
Before, DEMETRA J. MILLS, LORA M. GREEN and
RICHARD M. LEBOVITZ, Administrative Patent Judges.
MILLS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134. The Examiner has rejected
claims 31, 32, 40, 41, and 43-46 for anticipation. According to the Examiner,
claims 66-68 and 76 contain allowable subject matter. (Br. 2.) Claim 42 is
objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim. (Answer 2, Br.
2.) We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. § 6(b). We affirm the anticipation
rejections of the claims.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013