Appeal 2007-1228
Application 10/150,458
1 Collins (Collins 2) US 6,074,512 Jun. 13, 2000
2 Maydan US 6,109,206 Aug. 29, 2000
3 Maeda US 5,858,100 Jan. 12, 1999
4 Niori US 5,280,156 Jan. 18, 1994
5
6 First rejection: The Examiner rejected claims 1-2, 5 and 7 under
7 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable over Collins 1 in view of Imahashi
8 or Tomoyasu. Answer, pages 4-5.
9 Second rejection: The Examiner rejected claims 3-4 under 35 U.S.C.
10 § 103(a) as being unpatentable over Collins 1 in view of Imahashi or
11 Tomoyasu, further in view of Collins 2. Answer 6.
12 Third rejection: The Examiner rejected claims 3-4 under 35 U.S.C.
13 § 103(a) as being unpatentable over Collins 1 in view of Imahashi or
14 Tomoyasu, further in view of Maydan and Collins 2. Answer 6-7.
15 Fourth rejection: The Examiner rejected claims 6 and 8 under 35
16 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable over Collins 1 in view of Imahashi or
17 Tomoyasu, further in view of Maeda or Niori. Answer 8.
18 Fifth rejection: The Examiner rejected claim 9 under 35 U.S.C.
19 § 103(a) as being unpatentable over Collins 1 in view of Imahashi or
20 Tomoyasu, further in view of Maydan. Answer 8-9.
21 Sixth rejection: The Examiner also rejected claims 1-2 and 5-6 under
22 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable over Collins 1 in view of Niori.
23 Answer, page 9-10.
24 Seventh rejection: The Examiner rejected claims 3-4 under 35 U.S.C.
25 § 103(a) as being unpatentable over Collins 1 in view of Niori, further in
26 view of Collins 2. Answer 11-12.
4
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013