Ex Parte Gondhalekar et al - Page 7

               Appeal 2007-1228                                                                        
               Application 10/150,458                                                                  
           1         Collins 1 differs from Applied Materials' Fig. 5 embodiment in that               
           2   Collins 1 does not describe “an RF insulator disposed between the top RF                
           3   coil and the cold plate, the RF insulator having a heater integrated therein”.          
           4         Collins 1, Tomoyasu, Imahashi, and Niori disclose wafer heating                   
           5   devices where a coil or heat generating resistance is embedded within a                 
           6   material.                                                                               
           7         For example, Tomoyasu discloses a heater 3062 made by inserting a                 
           8   conductive resistance heating unit into an insulating sintered body made of             
           9   aluminum nitride for use in a suscepter 305 used to heat a treated substrate            
          10   W (wafer).  Tomoyasu, col. 10:44-50.                                                    
          11         Imahashi discloses a heating means 76 made of “a conductive                       
          12   resisting heat generating body… inserted in an insulating sintered body                 
          13   of, e.g. aluminum nitride” for hearing the surface of a wafer Imahashi, col.            
          14   11:20-31.                                                                               
          15         Niori discloses a wafer heating device 1 with a heat generating                   
          16   resistive element 3 embedded within a ceramic substrate 2.  Niori,                      
          17   Col. 4:11-17.                                                                           
          18                                 ANALYSIS                                                  
          19         As a result of the requirement for election, examination was limited to           
          20   the species (or embodiment) of Fig. 5.  Consistent with our holding in Ex               
          21   parte Ohsaka,  2 USPQ2d 1460 (Bd. Pat. App. & Int. 1987), we limit our                  
          22   consideration to the Fig. 5 embodiment, recognizing that additional                     
          23   examination of the non-elected species will follow.  During that                        
          24   examination, the Examiner may find art applicable not only to the non-                  

                                                                                                      
               2  We were unable to find reference number “306” within figure 8 of                     
               Tomoyasu but understand the heater to be within the susceptor 305.                      

                                                  7                                                    

Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013