Appeal 2007-1271 Application 10/005,583 SUMMARY OF DECISION It is our view, after consideration of the record before us, that the evidence relied upon supports the Examiner’s rejection of claims 1, 6-9, 12, 13, 16, and 21-23, but does not support the Examiner’s rejection of claims 2-5, 10, 11, 14, 15, 17-20, and 24. Accordingly, we AFFIRM-IN-PART. In addition, we have sua sponte set forth new grounds of rejection for independent claim 17 pursuant to our authority under 37 C.F.R. § 41.50(b). THE INVENTION The disclosed invention generally relates to a browser-controlled scanning system and method. More particularly, the disclosed invention relates to a system and method in which the operation of a scanning device is controlled from a browser such that documents are scanned and, where desired, optical character recognition is performed on the scanned documents for subsequent display to the user with a browser (Specification 1). The appeal contains claims 1-24. Claims 1, 9, 13, and 17 are independent claims. Claims 1 and 17 are illustrative: 1. A method for scanning a document, comprising: receiving a scan request from a user browser; uploading content to the user browser; receiving selections made with the user browser; and scanning the document in accordance with the user selections. 17. A scanning device, comprising: a processing device; scanning hardware; and memory comprising a scan control module and an embedded server, the scan control module comprising a scanning module and an optical 2Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013