Appeal 2007-1271
Application 10/005,583
character recognition module, the scan control module further including
logic for generating at least one control screen that can be uploaded to a user
browser.
THE REFERENCES
The Examiner relies upon the following references as evidence of
anticipation and obviousness:
Dance US 2002/0076111 A1 Jun. 20, 2002
Somashekar US 2002/0116477 A1 Aug. 22, 2002
Kuwata US 2003/0072031 A1 Apr. 17, 2003
THE REJECTIONS
Appellant seeks our review of the following rejections:
1. Claims 1-3, 6, 9, 11, 13, 15, and 21-23 stand rejected under
35 U.S.C. § 102(e) as being anticipated by Kuwata.
2. Claims 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, and 16 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C.
§ 103(a) as being unpatentable over Kuwata in view of Dance.
3. Claims 10 and 14 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being
unpatentable over Kuwata in view of Somashekar.
4. Claims 17-20, and 24 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as
being unpatentable over Kuwata in view of Dance, and further in
view of Somashekar.
ISSUES
The principal issues before us are whether Appellant has shown the
Examiner erred in rejecting claims 1-3, 6, 9, 11, 13, 15, and 21-23 based on
anticipation, and whether the Examiner erred in rejecting claims 4, 5, 7, 8,
10, 12, 14, 16-20, and 24 based on obviousness.
3
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013