Ex Parte M - Page 1



                            The opinion in support of the decision being entered today                                      
                                        is not binding precedent of the Board.                                              

                           UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                        
                                                  ________________                                                          
                                 BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                         
                                               AND INTERFERENCES                                                            
                                                  ________________                                                          
                                             Ex parte HICHEN M’SAAD                                                         
                                                  ________________                                                          
                                                   Appeal 2007-1312                                                         
                                                Application 10/997,715                                                      
                                                Technology Center 1700                                                      
                                                  ________________                                                          
                                                Decided:  June 15, 2007                                                     
                                                  ________________                                                          
                  Before EDWARD C. KIMLIN, BRADLEY R. GARRIS, and                                                           
                  CHARLES F. WARREN, Administrative Patent Judges.                                                          
                  KIMLIN, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                      

                                               DECISION ON APPEAL                                                           
                         This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 1-18, 20, and 29.                             
                  Claims 1, 20, and 29 are illustrative:                                                                    
                         1. A method for forming an optical waveguide on a substrate in a                                   
                  process chamber, the method comprising:                                                                   
                         depositing an undercladding layer over the substrate;                                              
                         forming a plurality of separated optical cores over the undercladding                              
                  layer, the plurality of optical cores defining a sequence of gaps;                                        
                                                                                                                           



Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013