The opinion in support of the decision being entered today is not binding precedent of the Board. UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte ROBERT J. HERBST, THANH HO, and DUANE R. JOHNSON ____________ Appeal 2007-1314 Application 10/227,933 Technology Center 3700 ____________ Decided: July 17, 2007 ____________ Before WILLIAM F. PATE, III, TERRY J. OWENS, and STUART S. LEVY, Administrative Patent Judges. PATE, III, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is an appeal from the Final Rejection of claims 1-10 and 21-30. Claims 11-20 stand withdrawn from consideration. These are the only claims in the application. We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. §§ 134 and 6.Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013