Appeal 2007-1314 Application 10/227,933 Claims 1-5, 7-10, and 21-30 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as unpatentable over Abel in view of Oda. Claim 6 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as unpatentable over Abel and Oda and further in view of Bayliss. ISSUE The sole issue for our consideration in this decision is the obviousness of the claims on appeal. FINDINGS OF FACTS Abel discloses an inlet/exhaust valve. The Examiner directs our attention to Figure 8 wherein a cylindrical portion 860 has a cavity extending therethrough and an inner and outer diameter. First valve seat is disposed on the outer diameter of the cylindrical portion and interacts with portions 864 of the housing. A second valve seat is disposed on the inner diameter of the cylindrical portion interacting with the element 870 near 872. According to the Examiner, Abel discloses the claimed subject matter with the exception of disclosing valve seats that have rounded seating surfaces. 3Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013