The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte RANDOLPH S. KOHLMAN, ALLAN W. SMITH, THOMAS E. GODFREY, CHARLES E. WILLBANKS, and ALLEN M. SMITH ____________ Appeal 2007-1373 Application 10/651,687 Technology Center 1700 ____________ Decided: August 30, 2007 ____________ Before CHUNG K. PAK, THOMAS A. WALTZ, and CATHERINE Q. TIMM, Administrative Patent Judges. WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the Primary Examiner’s final rejection of claims 73 through 83, which are the only claims pending in this application. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 6(b).Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013