Ex Parte Kohlman et al - Page 2

                    Appeal 2007-1373                                                                                                         
                    Application 10/651,687                                                                                                   

                             According to Appellants, the invention is directed to a textile                                                 
                    composite for constructing a bag used in non-immersion dry cleaning, where                                               
                    the composite comprises a textile substrate and a polymer facing with                                                    
                    specified Kawabata stiffness values and surface friction values for the walls                                            
                    of the bag (Br. 2).  Independent claim 73 is illustrative of the invention and a                                         
                    copy of this claim is reproduced below:                                                                                  
                    73. A textile composite for constructing an inherently two-dimensional                                                   
                    containment bag that, when constructed, has an interior surface and an                                                   
                    exterior surface, said bag being suitable for use in a non-immersion dry                                                 
                    cleaning process, wherein said composite is comprised of a textile substrate                                             
                    and a polymer facing, said composite having a minimum average Kawabata                                                   
                    stiffness value of at least about 0.6 gms (force) cm2 /cm. and a maximum                                                 
                    average Kawabata stiffness value of about 3.0 gms (force) cm2/cm., and                                                   
                    wherein the surface carrying said polymer facing has a maximum average                                                   
                    Kawabata surface friction value of about 0.35.                                                                           

                             The Examiner has relied on the following prior art references as                                                
                    evidence of unpatentability:                                                                                             
                    Feitlowitz                           US 3,809,573                             May 07, 1974                               
                    Drelich                               US 3,889,024                             Jun. 10, 1975                             
                    Cross                                  US 5,534,298                             Jul. 09, 1996                            
                    Scholz                                US 6,159,877                             Dec. 12, 2000                             
                                                       ISSUES ON APPEAL                                                                      
                             Claims 73-80 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as anticipated                                             
                    by or, in the alternative, under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as obvious over Feitlowitz                                           
                    (Answer 3).                                                                                                              
                             Claims 73-79 and 81 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as                                                  
                    anticipated by or, in the alternative, under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as obvious                                               
                    over Cross (Answer 4).                                                                                                   

                                                                     2                                                                       

Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013