The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
is not binding precedent of the Board
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_______________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_______________
Ex parte RONALD HAGE, JAN KLUGKIST,
and TON SWARTHOFF
______________
Appeal 2007-1396
Application 10/375,235
Technology Center 1700
_______________
Decided: September 27, 2007
_______________
Before BRADLEY R. GARRIS, CHARLES F. WARREN, and
CATHERINE Q. TIMM, Administrative Patent Judges.
WARREN, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
Applicants appeal to the Board from the decision of the Primary
Examiner finally rejecting claims 2, 4, 5, 7, 8, 11 through 18, and 20 in the
Office Action mailed June 5, 2005 (Office Action). 35 U.S.C. §§ 6 and
134(a) (2002); 37 C.F.R. § 41.31(a) (2005).
We affirm the decision of the Primary Examiner.
Claim 20 illustrates Appellants’ invention of a bleaching composition,
and is representative of the claims on appeal:
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013