Ex Parte Graziosi et al - Page 2



             Appeal 2007-1434                                                                                      
             Application 10/610,718                                                                                


                    The claimed invention is a system for reducing jet engine noise including the                  
             synergistic operation of fluidic vortex generators (fluidic chevrons) and a                           
             configurable thermal acoustic shield to reduce the exhaust jet noise.  Claims 1 and                   
             13, reproduced below, are further illustrative of the claimed subject matter.                         
                    1. A system for jet engine noise control of a jet engine having a main jet                     
             stream exiting a nozzle exit and flowing along a jet axis, the system comprising:                     
                    a thermal acoustic shield directed at a non-zero angle relative to the jet axis.               
                    13. A system for jet engine noise control of a jet engine having a main jet                    
             stream exiting a nozzle exit and flowing along a jet axis, the system comprising:                     
                    a fluidic chevron injected at a location relative to the nozzle exit for creating              
             a non-circular jet stream; and                                                                        
                    a thermal acoustic shield directed at a non-zero angle to the jet axis for                     
             selective noise reduction.                                                                            
                    The references of record relied upon by the Examiner as evidence of                            
             anticipation are:                                                                                     
             Hoch     US 3,721,314  Mar. 20, 1973                                                                  
             Braga Da Costa Campos  US 6,705,547 B2  Mar. 16, 2004                                                 
                    Claims 1-25 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102 as anticipated by Costa                       
             Campos.                                                                                               
                    Claims 1-25 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102 as anticipated by Hoch.                       
                    Appellants group the claims on appeal into two groups (Br. 6).  Claims                         
             1-12 stand or fall with claim 1 and claims 13-25 stand or fall with claim 13.                         

                                                        2                                                          



Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013