1 The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
2 for publication in and is not binding precedent of the Board.
3
4 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
5 ___________
6
7 BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
8 AND INTERFERENCES
9 ___________
10
11 Ex parte ERIC G. LOVETT, ROBERT J. SWEENEY,
12 DAVID T. JACOBSEN, and GILDO L. EPIS JR.
13 ___________
14
15 Appeal 2007-1451
16 Application 09/970,146
17 Technology Center 3700
18 ___________
19
20 Decided: June 13, 2007
21 ___________
22
23 Before WILLIAM F. PATE, III, LINDA E. HORNER, and
24 ANTON W. FETTING, Administrative Patent Judges.
25
26 FETTING, Administrative Patent Judge.
27
28 DECISION ON APPEAL
29
30
31 STATEMENT OF CASE
32 This appeal involves claims 1, 3-10, 12-14, 16, 21-23, 26, 28-29, 33, and 58-
33 69, the only claims pending and remaining under consideration in this application1.
34 We have jurisdiction over the appeal pursuant to 35 U.S.C. §§ 6 and 134.
1 Claims 2, 11, 15, 17-20, 24-25, 27, 30-32, and 34-37 are withdrawn from
consideration and claims 38-57 are cancelled.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013