Ex Parte Lovett et al - Page 4

           Appeal 2007-1451                                                                         
           Application 09/970,146                                                                   

       1       The Appellants contend that Maseda does not describe at least one electrode          
       2   coupled with the device body, where the at least one electrode is configured to          
       3   transmit and receive electrical signals to and from tissue (Br. 17-19).  The             
       4   Appellants are not particularly clear on the difference between the claim and the        
       5   Examiner’s characterization of Maseda, but their contention appears to focus on          
       6   the lack of the claimed configuration so as to transmit and receive such signals.        
       7   This focus is particularly clear in their contention of the lack of an inherent          
       8   capacity in the electrode disclosed in Maseda to transmit and receive such signals       
       9   (Br. 20).                                                                                
      10       With regard to the obviousness rejection over Lieber and Maseda, the                 
      11   Examiner finds that Lieber discloses a medical device comprising an elongate             
      12   device body and at least one electrode 35 coupled thereto for stimulating and            
      13   sensing. The Examiner finds that Lieber does not disclose the use of an assembly         
      14   coupled with the device body including a rheometric material that contracts and/or       
      15   stiffens when electrical current is applied thereto. To overcome this deficiency, the    
      16   Examiner finds that Maseda teaches that the use of such an assembly on a wide            
      17   range of medical devices including the type disclosed by Lieber is advantageous          
      18   from the standpoint of increasing flexibility and steerability of the catheter as it is  
      19   introduced into the body. The Examiner concludes that it would have been obvious         
      20   to a person of ordinary skill in the art to have combined Maseda’s rheometric            
      21   material in Lieber’s device because increased maneuverability through the tortuous       
      22   vasculature system, high precision, and ease of placement, being very important          
      23   design considerations for the medical artisan, make the incorporation of the             
      24   Maseda assembly and related control system on the medical device of Lieber an            
      25   obvious choice. (Answer 4).                                                              

                                                 4                                                  


Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013