The opinion in support of the decision being entered today is not binding precedent of the Board UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE _______________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES _______________ Ex parte BURKHARD KÖHLER, JOACHIM PROBST, and MICHAEL SONNTAG ______________ Appeal No. 2007-1487 Application 09/562,632 Technology Center 1700 _______________ Decided: May 31, 2007 _______________ Before CHUNG K. PAK, PAK, CHARLES F. WARREN, and CATHERINE Q. TIMM, Administrative Patent Judges. WARREN, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL Applicants appeal to the Board from the decision of the Primary Examiner finally rejecting claims 1 through 8 in the Office Action mailed December 8, 2005. 35 U.S.C. §§ 6 and 134(a) (2002); 37 C.F.R. § 41.31(a) (2005). We affirm the decision of the Primary Examiner. 1Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013