Appeal 2007-1517
Application 09/726,973
Nickerson US 6,606,581 B1 Aug. 12, 2003
(filed Jun. 14, 2000)
Subramonian US 6,701,362 B1 Mar. 2, 2004
(filed Feb. 23, 2000)
Philyaw US 6,836,799 B1 Dec. 28, 2004
(filed Aug. 24, 1999)
Haitsuka US 6,847,992 B1 Jan. 25, 2005
(filed Jul. 31, 2000)
THE REJECTIONS
Claims 1-18 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 112, first paragraph, as
failing to comply with the written description requirement.
Claims 1, 2, 4-7, 13, and 15-17 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C.
§ 103(a) as being unpatentable over the teachings of Mitchell in view of
Haitsuka.
Claim 3 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being
unpatentable over the teachings of Mitchell in view of Haitsuka, and further
in view of Subramonian.
Claims 8-12 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being
unpatentable over the teachings of Mitchell in view of Haitsuka, and further
in view of Official Notice.
Claim 14 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being
unpatentable over the teachings of Mitchell in view of Haitsuka, and further
in view of Nickerson.
Claim 18 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being
unpatentable over the teachings of Mitchell in view of Haitsuka, and further
in view of Philyaw.
3
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013