Appeal 2007-1517
Application 09/726,973
sustain the Examiner’s rejection of claim 14 as being unpatentable over
Mitchell in view of Haitsuka and Nickerson. Lastly, we will sustain the
Examiner’s rejection of claim 18 as being unpatentable over Mitchell in
view of Haitsuka and Philyaw.
CONCLUSION
We have sustained at least one rejection for each claim on appeal.
Therefore, the decision of the Examiner rejecting claims 1-18 is affirmed.
No time period for taking any subsequent action in connection with
this appeal may be extended under 37 C.F.R. § 1.136(a)(1)(iv).
AFFIRMED
rwk
LERNER, DAVID, LITTENBERG,
KRUMHOLZ & MENTLIK
600 SOUTH AVENUE WEST
WESTFIELD NJ 07090
9
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Last modified: September 9, 2013