The opinion in support of the decision being entered today is not binding
precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte YEVGENIY EUGENE SHTEYN
____________
Appeal 2007-1568
Application 09/900,375
Technology Center 2800
____________
Decided: October 1, 2007
____________
Before KENNETH W. HAIRSTON, JEAN R. HOMERE, and
ST JOHN COURTENAY, Administrative Patent Judges.
HOMERE, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
Appellant appeals under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the Examiner’s Final
Rejection of claims 1 through 13. We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C.
§ 6(b) to decide this appeal. We affirm.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013