The opinion in support of the decision being entered today is not binding precedent of the Board UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________________ Ex parte NEAL A. OSBORN and KENNETH D. COMSTOCK ____________________ Appeal 2007-1572 Application 09/726,8311 Technology Center 2600 ____________________ Decided: September 27, 2007 ____________________ Before JEAN R. HOMERE, JAY P. LUCAS, and MARC S. HOFF, Administrative Patent Judges. HOFF, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL STATEMENT OF CASE Appellants appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from a final rejection of claims 1-13 and 15-30. We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. § 6(b). We reverse. 1 Application filed November 30, 2000. The real party in interest is Palm Inc.Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013