Appeal 2007-1572 Application 09/726,831 and additional memory is allocated to satisfy the memory requirements of a selected graphics mode (col. 1, ll. 40-49; col. 3, ll. 13-23). 11. Nale’s invention enables a system memory to be shared by a graphics controller without requiring a user to reboot the system to accommodate more demanding graphics modes (col. 1, ll. 41-44; col. 3, ll. 25-29). Reddy 12. Reddy teaches a shared memory graphics accelerator system that provides graphics display data to a display (Abstract). 13. Reddy includes an on-chip frame buffer 112 and an off-chip frame buffer 114 (Fig. 2). PRINCIPLES OF LAW In rejecting claims under 35 U.S.C. § 103, the Examiner bears the initial burden of establishing a prima facie case of obviousness. In re Piasecki, 745 F.2d 1468, 1472, 223 USPQ 785, 788 (Fed. Cir. 1984). The Examiner can satisfy this burden by showing some articulated reasoning with some rational underpinning to support the legal conclusion of obviousness. KSR Int’l. v. Teleflex Inc., 127 S. Ct. 1727, 1741, 82 USPQ2d 1385, 1396 (2007) (citing In re Kahn, 441 F.3d 977, 988, 78 USPQ2d 1329, 1336 (Fed. Cir. 2006)). Only if this initial burden is met does the burden of coming forward with evidence or argument shift to the Appellant. Piasecki, 745 F.2d at 1472, 223 USPQ at 788. Thus, the Examiner must not only assure that the requisite findings are made, based on evidence of record, but must also explain the reasoning by which the findings are deemed to support the Examiner’s conclusion. 6Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013