The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte ARLEN L. ROESNER, CLINT E. CONRADY, TOM J. SEARBY,
and DAVID W. MAYER
____________
Appeal 2007-1671
Application 10/374,837
Technology Center 3600
____________
Decided: August 27, 2007
____________
Before MURRIEL E. CRAWFORD, LINDA E. HORNER, and JOSEPH A.
FISCHETTI, Administrative Patent Judges.
FISCHETTI, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
Appellants Roesner et al. seek our review under 35 U.S.C. § 134 of the
Examiner’s final rejection of claims 8-14. We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C.
§ 6(b) (2002).
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013