Appeal 2007-1671
Application 10/374,837
SUMMARY OF DECISION
We AFFIRM.
THE INVENTION
Appellants claim a computer system drive cage which is said to comprise a
bezel-less drive cage coupled to the chassis and adapted to receive at least one
frontally-exposed drive (Specification 2:1-5).
Claim 8, reproduced below, is representative of the subject matter on appeal.
8. A bezel-less drive cage for a computer chassis, comprising:
a plurality of spaced apart walls adapted to receive at least one drive,
the walls further adapted to be coupled to the chassis; and
at least one extension member configured to extend forward of a
frontal mounting surface of the chassis to coincide with a bezel coupled to
the computer chassis when the drive cage is installed in the computer
chassis.
The Examiner relies upon the following as evidence of unpatentability:
Oros US 5,485,348 Jan. 16, 1996
Liu US 6,305,648 B1 Oct. 23, 2001
THE REJECTIONS
The following rejections are before us for review:
1. Claims 9-10 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 112, second paragraph, as
2
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013