The opinion in support of the decision being entered today is not binding precedent of the Board UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE _______________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES _______________ Ex parte RANDY E. KEEN, ALAN KODER, and DAVID EVANS ______________ Appeal 2007-1689 Application 10/431,627 Technology Center 1700 _______________ Decided: September 25, 2007 _______________ Before CHARLES F. WARREN, THOMAS A. WALTZ, and CATHERINE Q. TIMM, Administrative Patent Judges. WARREN, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL Applicants appeal to the Board from the decision of the Primary Examiner finally rejecting for at least the second time claims 1 through 20 in the Office Action mailed October 18, 2005. 35 U.S.C. §§ 6 and 134(a) (2002); 37 C.F.R. § 41.31(a) (2006). We affirm the decision of the Primary Examiner.Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013