The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
is not binding precedent of the Board
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________________
Ex parte RADU S. JASINSCHI,
NEVENKA DIMITROVA, and JOHN ZIMMERMAN
____________________
Appeal 2007-1699
Application 10/165,9041
Technology Center 2100
____________________
Decided: October 26, 2007
____________________
Before JAMES D. THOMAS, HOWARD B. BLANKENSHIP,
and MARC S. HOFF, Administrative Patent Judges.
HOFF, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
STATEMENT OF CASE
Appellants appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from a Final Rejection of
claims 1-24. We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. § 6(b).
We reverse.
1 Application filed June 10, 2002. The real party in interest is U.S. Philips
Corporation.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013