Ex Parte Konieczynski et al - Page 1



                      The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written             
                             for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                      
                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                              
                                                __________                                                   
                            BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                               
                                        AND INTERFERENCES                                                    
                                                __________                                                   
                    Ex parte DAVID D. KONIECZYNSKI, THOMAS V. DOHERTY,                                       
                             ALEXANDER GRINBERG, and ERIC D. KOLB                                            
                                                __________                                                   
                                             Appeal 2007-1707                                                
                                          Application 10/335,597                                             
                                         Technology Center 3733                                              
                                                __________                                                   
                                         DECIDED: May 16, 2007                                               
                                                __________                                                   
                Before DONALD E. ADAMS, TONI R. SCHEINER, and RICHARD M.                                     
                LEBOVITZ, Administrative Patent Judges.                                                      
                LEBOVITZ, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                       

                                         DECISION ON APPEAL                                                  
                      This is a decision on appeal from the final rejection of claims 1-3 and                
                5-11.  We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. § 6(b).  We affirm-in-part.                      

                                         STATEMENT OF CASE                                                   
                      The claimed invention relates to a bone plate comprising a resilient                   
                aperture.  According to the specification, “[b]one fixation devices are useful               
                for promoting the proper healing of injured or damaged vertebral bone                        




Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013