The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE __________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES __________ Ex parte DAVID D. KONIECZYNSKI, THOMAS V. DOHERTY, ALEXANDER GRINBERG, and ERIC D. KOLB __________ Appeal 2007-1707 Application 10/335,597 Technology Center 3733 __________ DECIDED: May 16, 2007 __________ Before DONALD E. ADAMS, TONI R. SCHEINER, and RICHARD M. LEBOVITZ, Administrative Patent Judges. LEBOVITZ, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on appeal from the final rejection of claims 1-3 and 5-11. We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. § 6(b). We affirm-in-part. STATEMENT OF CASE The claimed invention relates to a bone plate comprising a resilient aperture. According to the specification, “[b]one fixation devices are useful for promoting the proper healing of injured or damaged vertebral bonePage: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013