Ex Parte MAEGAWA et al - Page 1




                 The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written                  
                         for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                          

                        UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                            
                                               ____________                                                  
                             BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                              
                                         AND INTERFERENCES                                                   
                                               ____________                                                  
                   Ex parte HIROTOSHI MAEGAWA, HIDEYASU KARASAWA, and                                        
                                         MASAHARU TAKANO                                                     
                                               ____________                                                  
                                             Appeal 2007-1720                                                
                                          Application 09/148,832                                             
                                          Technology Center 3600                                             
                                               ____________                                                  
                                           Decided:  July 3, 2007                                            
                                               ____________                                                  
            Before HUBERT C. LORIN, LINDA E. HORNER, and ANTON W. FETTING,                                   
            Administrative Patent Judges.                                                                    
            HORNER, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                             


                                         DECISION ON APPEAL                                                  










Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013