The opinion in support of the decision being entered today is not binding precedent of the Board. UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte GARY L. SWOBODA and ROBERT A. MCGOWAN ____________ Appeal 2007-1754 Application 09/943,5991 Technology Center 2100 ____________ Decided: August 29, 2007 ____________ Before KENNETH W. HAIRSTON, JOHN C. MARTIN, and JOHN A. JEFFERY, Administrative Patent Judges. JEFFERY, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL Appellants appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the Examiner’s rejection of claims 1, 4, 5, 13, 15, 16, 23, 24, and 27-30. We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. § 6(b). We reverse. 1 This application is a divisional of Application Ser. No. 09/798,561, filed Mar. 2, 2001, now U.S. Pat. 6,985,848.Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013