The opinion in support of the decision being entered today is
not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte SAMUEL PEARLMAN, ROBERT EARL KREIDER
and RICHARD LAPERITA JR.
____________
Appeal 2007-1770
Application 10/632,289
Technology Center 1700
____________
Decided: August 20, 2007
____________
Before CHUNG K. PAK, CATHERINE Q. TIMM, and
JEFFREY T. SMITH, Administrative Patent Judges.
TIMM, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
Appellants appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134(a) from the Examiner’s
decision rejecting claims 1-8 and 13-20. Claims 9-12, the only other claims
pending in the Application, are not rejected and, therefore, not on appeal.
We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. § 6(b).
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013