Appeal 2007-1793 Application 10/911,196 of said top end; providing a guide member positioned in said internal chamber of said housing and secured to said spring rod, said guide member supporting said rod member for reciprocation axially in said housing between a retracted and an extended position relative thereto; providing a locking arrangement that is at least partially secured to said housing, said locking arrangement designed to engage said spring rod to inhibit axial movement of said spring rod, said locking arrangement including a locking sleeve that comprises a one piece upper section, a lower section and a cavity axially positioned in said upper and lower sections, said cavity of said locking sleeve having a shape and size that enables at least a portion of said spring rod to move in said lower section of said locking sleeve, said lower section of said locking sleeve including a plurality of movable legs designed to movably engage at least a portion of said spring rod and to at least partially inhibit or prevent axial movement of said spring rod. THE REJECTIONS The Examiner relies upon the following as evidence of unpatentability: Hubweber US 4,078,778 Mar. 14, 1978 Gottling US 4,577,732 Mar. 25, 1986 The following rejections are before us for review: 1. Claims 27, 37, 39, 41, 43, 53, 55, and 57 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as anticipated by Hubweber. 4Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013