Appeal 2007-1793
Application 10/911,196
CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
We conclude that the Appellants have shown that the Examiner erred in
rejecting claims 27, 37, 39, and 41 as anticipated by Hubweber and claims 27, 37,
39, 41, 43, 53, 55, and 57 as anticipated by Gottling. We further conclude that the
Appellants have failed to show that the Examiner erred in rejecting claims 43, 53,
55, and 57 as anticipated by Hubweber.
DECISION
The decision of the Examiner to reject claims 27, 37, 39, and 41 as
anticipated by Hubweber and claims 27, 37, 39, 41, 43, 53, 55, and 57 as
anticipated by Gottling is reversed. The decision of the Examiner to reject claims
43, 53, 55, and 57 as anticipated by Hubweber is affirmed.
No time period for taking any subsequent action in connection with this
appeal may be extended under 37 C.F.R. § 1.136(a). See 37 C.F.R.
§ 1.136(a)(1)(iv) (2006).
AFFIRMED-IN-PART
jlb
FAY SHARPE LLP
1100 SUPERIOR AVENUE, SEVENTH FLOOR
CLEVELAND OH 44114
14
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
Last modified: September 9, 2013